「The Year Neon Jammed Britain’s Radios」の版間の差分

提供: Kakerunpedia
ナビゲーションに移動 検索に移動
(ページの作成:「1939’s Strange Neon vs Wireless Battle <br><br>It sounds bizarre today: on the eve of the Second World War, the House of Commons was debating glowing shopfronts. <br>…」)
 
 
1行目: 1行目:
1939’s Strange Neon vs Wireless Battle  <br><br>It sounds bizarre today: on the eve of the Second World War, the House of Commons was debating glowing shopfronts.  <br><br>Mr. Gallacher, an MP with a sharp tongue, demanded answers from the Postmaster-General. How many complaints had rolled in about wireless sets being ruined by neon signage?  <br><br>The figure was no joke: roughly one thousand cases logged in a single year.  <br><br>Think about it: ordinary families huddled around a crackling set, desperate for dance music or speeches from the King, only to hear static and buzzing from the local cinema’s neon sign.  <br><br>Postmaster-General Major Tryon admitted the scale of the headache. The difficulty?: there was no law compelling interference suppression.  <br><br>He said legislation was being explored, but admitted consultations would take "some time".  <br><br>Translation? Parliament was stalling.  <br><br>The MP wasn’t satisfied. He said listeners were getting a raw deal.  <br><br>Another MP raised the stakes. Wasn’t the state itself one of the worst offenders?  <br><br>Tryon deflected, saying yes, cables were part of the mess, which only complicated things further.  <br><br>---  <br><br>Seen through modern eyes, it’s heritage comedy with a lesson. Neon was once painted as the noisy disruptor.  <br><br>Jump ahead eight decades and the roles have flipped: the menace of 1939 is now the endangered beauty of 2025.  <br><br>---  <br><br>Why does it matter?  <br><br>Neon has always been political,  neon signs London cultural, disruptive. It’s always forced society to decide what kind of light it wants.  <br><br>In truth, it’s been art all along.  <br><br>---  <br><br>Our take at Smithers. We see proof that neon was powerful enough to shake Britain.  <br><br>Call it quaint, call it heritage, but it’s a reminder. And it still does.  <br><br>---  <br><br>Don’t settle for plastic impostors. Authentic glow sign makers ([http://www.sunti-apairach.com/nakhonchum1/index.php?name=webboard&file=read&id=1001389 content]) has history on its side.  <br><br>If neon got MPs shouting in 1939, it deserves a place in your space today.  <br><br>Choose glow.  <br><br>You need it.  <br><br>---
+
1939’s Strange Neon vs Wireless Battle  <br><br>Looking back, it feels surreal: in the shadow of looming global conflict, Parliament was wrestling with the problem of neon interfering with radios.  <br><br>Mr. Gallacher, an MP with a sharp tongue, demanded answers from the Postmaster-General. Were neon installations scrambling the airwaves?  <br><br>The answer was astonishing for the time: the Department had received nearly one thousand reports from frustrated licence-payers.  <br><br>Imagine it: [http://www.seong-ok.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=5765974 creative lighting London] ordinary families huddled around a crackling set, desperate for dance music or speeches from the King, only to hear static and buzzing from the local cinema’s neon sign.  <br><br>Major Tryon confessed the problem was real. But here’s the rub: the government had no legal power to force neon owners to fix it.  <br><br>He spoke of a possible new Wireless Telegraphy Bill, but stressed that the problem was "complex".  <br><br>Translation? Parliament was stalling.  <br><br>Gallacher pressed harder. People were paying licence fees, he argued, and they deserved a clear signal.  <br><br>Mr. Poole piled in too. Wasn’t the state itself one of the worst offenders?  <br><br>Tryon deflected, admitting it made the matter "difficult" but offering no real solution.  <br><br>---  <br><br>Looking back now, this debate is almost poetic. In 1939 neon was the villain of the airwaves.  <br><br>Fast forward to today and it’s the opposite story: the once-feared glow is now the heritage art form begging for protection.  <br><br>---  <br><br>What does it tell us?  <br><br>Neon has never been neutral. It’s always pitted artisans against technology.  <br><br>Now it’s dismissed as retro fluff.  <br><br>---  <br><br>Our take at Smithers. We see proof that neon was powerful enough to shake Britain.  <br><br>Call it quaint, call it heritage, but it’s a reminder. And it always will.  <br><br>---  <br><br>Ignore the buzzwords of "LED neon". Glass and gas are the original and the best.  <br><br>If neon could shake Westminster before the war, it can certainly shake your walls now.  <br><br>Choose the real thing.  <br><br>Smithers has it.  <br><br>---

2025年9月23日 (火) 08:00時点における最新版

1939’s Strange Neon vs Wireless Battle

Looking back, it feels surreal: in the shadow of looming global conflict, Parliament was wrestling with the problem of neon interfering with radios.

Mr. Gallacher, an MP with a sharp tongue, demanded answers from the Postmaster-General. Were neon installations scrambling the airwaves?

The answer was astonishing for the time: the Department had received nearly one thousand reports from frustrated licence-payers.

Imagine it: creative lighting London ordinary families huddled around a crackling set, desperate for dance music or speeches from the King, only to hear static and buzzing from the local cinema’s neon sign.

Major Tryon confessed the problem was real. But here’s the rub: the government had no legal power to force neon owners to fix it.

He spoke of a possible new Wireless Telegraphy Bill, but stressed that the problem was "complex".

Translation? Parliament was stalling.

Gallacher pressed harder. People were paying licence fees, he argued, and they deserved a clear signal.

Mr. Poole piled in too. Wasn’t the state itself one of the worst offenders?

Tryon deflected, admitting it made the matter "difficult" but offering no real solution.

---

Looking back now, this debate is almost poetic. In 1939 neon was the villain of the airwaves.

Fast forward to today and it’s the opposite story: the once-feared glow is now the heritage art form begging for protection.

---

What does it tell us?

Neon has never been neutral. It’s always pitted artisans against technology.

Now it’s dismissed as retro fluff.

---

Our take at Smithers. We see proof that neon was powerful enough to shake Britain.

Call it quaint, call it heritage, but it’s a reminder. And it always will.

---

Ignore the buzzwords of "LED neon". Glass and gas are the original and the best.

If neon could shake Westminster before the war, it can certainly shake your walls now.

Choose the real thing.

Smithers has it.

---