差分

1939’s Strange Neon vs Wireless Battle <br><br>It sounds bizarre todayLooking back, it feels surreal: on in the eve shadow of the Second World Warlooming global conflict, Parliament was wrestling with the House problem of Commons was debating glowing shopfrontsneon interfering with radios. <br><br>Mr. Gallacher, an MP with a sharp tongue, demanded answers from the Postmaster-General. How many complaints had rolled in about wireless sets being ruined by Were neon signageinstallations scrambling the airwaves? <br><br>The figure answer was no jokeastonishing for the time: roughly the Department had received nearly one thousand cases logged in a single yearreports from frustrated licence-payers. <br><br>Think about Imagine it: [http://www.seong-ok.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=5765974 creative lighting London] ordinary families huddled around a crackling set, desperate for dance music or speeches from the King, only to hear static and buzzing from the local cinema’s neon sign. <br><br>Postmaster-General Major Tryon admitted confessed the scale of problem was real. But here’s the headache. The difficulty?rub: there was the government had no law compelling interference suppressionlegal power to force neon owners to fix it. <br><br>He said legislation was being exploredspoke of a possible new Wireless Telegraphy Bill, but admitted consultations would take stressed that the problem was "some timecomplex". <br><br>Translation? Parliament was stalling. <br><br>The MP wasn’t satisfiedGallacher pressed harder. He said listeners People were getting paying licence fees, he argued, and they deserved a raw dealclear signal. <br><br>Another MP raised the stakesMr. Poole piled in too. Wasn’t the state itself one of the worst offenders? <br><br>Tryon deflected, saying yes, cables were part of admitting it made the mess, which only complicated things furthermatter "difficult" but offering no real solution. <br><br>--- <br><br>Seen through modern eyesLooking back now, it’s heritage comedy with a lessonthis debate is almost poetic. Neon In 1939 neon was once painted as the noisy disruptorvillain of the airwaves. <br><br>Jump ahead eight decades Fast forward to today and it’s the roles have flippedopposite story: the menace of 1939 once-feared glow is now the endangered beauty of 2025heritage art form begging for protection. <br><br>--- <br><br>Why What does it mattertell us? <br><br>Neon has always never been political, neon signs London cultural, disruptiveneutral. It’s always forced society to decide what kind of light it wantspitted artisans against technology. <br><br>In truth, Now it’s been art all alongdismissed as retro fluff. <br><br>--- <br><br>Our take at Smithers. We see proof that neon was powerful enough to shake Britain. <br><br>Call it quaint, call it heritage, but it’s a reminder. And it still doesalways will. <br><br>--- <br><br>Don’t settle for plastic impostorsIgnore the buzzwords of "LED neon". Authentic glow sign makers ([http://www.sunti-apairach.com/nakhonchum1/index.php?name=webboard&file=read&id=1001389 content]) has history on its sideGlass and gas are the original and the best. <br><br>If neon got MPs shouting in 1939could shake Westminster before the war, it deserves a place in can certainly shake your space todaywalls now. <br><br>Choose glowthe real thing. <br><br>You need Smithers has it. <br><br>---