「Static And Glow: Parliament’s Strange Neon Row」の版間の差分
EliseJ00500 (トーク | 投稿記録) 細 |
Tyrone61K3383 (トーク | 投稿記録) 細 |
||
| 1行目: | 1行目: | ||
| − | + | Britain’s Pre-War Glow Problem <br><br>Looking back, it feels surreal: on the eve of the Second World War, the House of Commons was debating glowing shopfronts. <br><br>Gallacher, never one to mince words, rose to challenge the government. Were neon installations scrambling the airwaves? <br><br>The reply turned heads: the Department had received nearly one thousand reports from frustrated licence-payers. <br><br>Picture it: the soundtrack of Britain in 1938, interrupted not by enemy bombers but by shopfront glow. <br><br>Major Tryon confessed the problem was real. The difficulty?: the government had no legal power to force neon owners to fix it. <br><br>He said legislation was being explored, but warned the issue touched too many interests. <br><br>Translation? Parliament was stalling. <br><br>The MP wasn’t satisfied. He pushed for urgency: speed it up, Minister, people want results. <br><br>Mr. Poole piled in too. Wasn’t the state itself one of the worst offenders? <br><br>The Postmaster-General ducked the blow, admitting it made the matter "difficult" but offering no real solution. <br><br>--- <br><br>From today’s vantage, it feels rich with irony. Back then, [http://florence.boignard.free.fr/cms/spip.php?article28 neon sign shop London] was the tech menace keeping people up at night. <br><br>Eighty years on, the irony bites: neon is the endangered craft fighting for survival, while plastic LED fakes flood the market. <br><br>--- <br><br>What does it tell us? <br><br>First: neon has always rattled cages. It’s always pitted artisans against technology. <br><br>Now it’s dismissed as retro fluff. <br><br>--- <br><br>The Smithers View. We see the glow that wouldn’t be ignored. <br><br>Call it quaint, call it heritage, but it’s a reminder. And it always will. <br><br>--- <br><br>Forget the fake LED strips. Authentic glow has history on its side. <br><br>If neon got MPs shouting in 1939, it deserves a place in your space today. <br><br>Choose craft. <br><br>We make it. <br><br>--- | |
2025年9月24日 (水) 06:33時点における版
Britain’s Pre-War Glow Problem
Looking back, it feels surreal: on the eve of the Second World War, the House of Commons was debating glowing shopfronts.
Gallacher, never one to mince words, rose to challenge the government. Were neon installations scrambling the airwaves?
The reply turned heads: the Department had received nearly one thousand reports from frustrated licence-payers.
Picture it: the soundtrack of Britain in 1938, interrupted not by enemy bombers but by shopfront glow.
Major Tryon confessed the problem was real. The difficulty?: the government had no legal power to force neon owners to fix it.
He said legislation was being explored, but warned the issue touched too many interests.
Translation? Parliament was stalling.
The MP wasn’t satisfied. He pushed for urgency: speed it up, Minister, people want results.
Mr. Poole piled in too. Wasn’t the state itself one of the worst offenders?
The Postmaster-General ducked the blow, admitting it made the matter "difficult" but offering no real solution.
---
From today’s vantage, it feels rich with irony. Back then, neon sign shop London was the tech menace keeping people up at night.
Eighty years on, the irony bites: neon is the endangered craft fighting for survival, while plastic LED fakes flood the market.
---
What does it tell us?
First: neon has always rattled cages. It’s always pitted artisans against technology.
Now it’s dismissed as retro fluff.
---
The Smithers View. We see the glow that wouldn’t be ignored.
Call it quaint, call it heritage, but it’s a reminder. And it always will.
---
Forget the fake LED strips. Authentic glow has history on its side.
If neon got MPs shouting in 1939, it deserves a place in your space today.
Choose craft.
We make it.
---
