差分

ナビゲーションに移動 検索に移動
編集の要約なし
When [https://wiki.giroudmathias.ch/index.php?title=Utilisateur:AshlyBeers47526 vintage neon signs London] Crashed the Airwaves Britain’s Pre-War Glow Problem <br><br>It sounds bizarre todayLooking back, it feels surreal: in on the shadow eve of looming global conflictthe Second World War, MPs in Westminster were arguing about neon signsthe House of Commons was debating glowing shopfronts. <br><br>Mr. Gallacher, an MP with a sharp tonguenever one to mince words, stood up and asked rose to challenge the Postmaster-General a peculiar but pressing questiongovernment. How many complaints had rolled in about wireless sets being ruined by Were neon signageinstallations scrambling the airwaves? <br><br>The reply turned heads: the Department had received nearly one thousand reports from frustrated licence-payers. <br><br>Picture it: listeners straining to catch news bulletinsthe soundtrack of Britain in 1938, drowned out interrupted not by enemy bombers but by the hum of glowing adverts on the high streetshopfront glow. <br><br>Major Tryon confessed the problem was real. The snag was thisdifficulty?: there was the government had no law compelling interference suppressionlegal power to force neon owners to fix it. <br><br>He said legislation was being explored, but warned the issue touched too many interests. <br><br>In plain English: no fix any time soonTranslation? Parliament was stalling. <br><br>Gallacher shot backThe MP wasn’t satisfied. He pushed for urgency: speed it up, Minister, people want results. <br><br>Mr. Poole piled in too. If neon was a culprit, weren’t cables buzzing across Wasn’t the state itself one of the land just as guiltyworst offenders? <br><br>The Minister squirmedPostmaster-General ducked the blow, saying yes, cables were part of admitting it made the mess, which only complicated things furthermatter "difficult" but offering no real solution. <br><br>--- <br><br>Seen through modern eyesFrom today’s vantage, it’s heritage comedy it feels rich with a lessonirony. Back then, personalised [http://florence.boignard.free.fr/cms/spip.php?article28 neon signs sign shop London neon ] was the tech menace keeping people up at night. <br><br>Jump ahead eight decades and Eighty years on, the roles have flippedirony bites: the menace of 1939 neon is now the endangered beauty of 2025craft fighting for survival, while plastic LED fakes flood the market. <br><br>--- <br><br>What does it tell us? <br><br>Neon First: neon has always been political, cultural, disruptiverattled cages. It’s always pitted artisans against technology. <br><br>Second: every era misjudges neonNow it’s dismissed as retro fluff. <br><br>--- <br><br>Our take at The SmithersView. When we look at We see the glow that 1939 Hansard record, we don’t just see dusty MPs moaning about staticwouldn’t be ignored. <br><br>Call it quaint, call it heritage, but it’s a reminder. And that’s why we keep bending glass and filling it with gas todayalways will. <br><br>--- <br><br>Ignore Forget the buzzwords of "fake LED neon"strips. Authentic glow has history on its side. <br><br>If neon could shake Westminster before the wargot MPs shouting in 1939, it can certainly shake deserves a place in your walls nowspace today. <br><br>Choose craft. <br><br>Smithers has We make it. <br><br>---
4

回編集

案内メニュー